Print Page | Close Window

Spark plugs, misfires, and general ignition system

Printed From: TheAMCForum.com
Category: The Garage
Forum Name: AMC 6 Cylinder Engine Repair and Modifications
Forum Description: AMC-made I-6 engine mechanical, ignition and fuel from basic repair to high-perf modifications
URL: https://theamcforum.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=119120
Printed Date: Apr/23/2024 at 6:09pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Spark plugs, misfires, and general ignition system
Posted By: mtrosclair
Subject: Spark plugs, misfires, and general ignition system
Date Posted: Mar/24/2023 at 1:38pm
Good afternoon folks I’ve been getting a slight misfire at idle and at constant engine running speeds so today I decided to go ahead and pull the plugs and look under the rotor and see what was going on. The spark plugs all look about the same I’m posting a picture (#1 is on the right, #6 left) so any spark plug gurus can tell me if they look right or not, from what I can find online this seems to be a proper color. These plugs having about 400 miles on them total. When I pulled the cap, there is some arcing evidence near the five and three cylinder terminals, I’m wondering if whatever is causing this could be the reason for my misfire. I have ordered plug wires, and new plugs, just to remove those as a possibility of being an issue.

While looking for spark plugs, however I did observe that they make an HEI distributor that fits the engine, I am wondering if that would give me smoother ignition then I’m currently experiencing with the stock distributor, with an electronic module installed. 







-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.



Replies:
Posted By: Trader
Date Posted: Mar/24/2023 at 2:15pm
Well you can print this out to read your plugs:
https://www.lazerhelmets.com/lean-spark-plug-chart/" rel="nofollow - https://www.lazerhelmets.com/lean-spark-plug-chart/
IMO the plugs are good.
But the distributor cap is saying there is a problem. The arc tracing on 3 of 6 plug terminals, 2 being not good at all indicate there is a problem. It could be the cap, but first guess since they are all one side is the distributor shaft or gear may be worn.
A coil/points/condenser will usually have indications on all plug terminals.
The other possibility is 3 bad wires and if those worst arc lines are cylinders 5 + 3 then I'd start there and replace the rotor/cap.


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Mar/24/2023 at 2:42pm
Originally posted by Trader Trader wrote:

Well you can print this out to read your plugs:
https://www.lazerhelmets.com/lean-spark-plug-chart/" rel="nofollow - https://www.lazerhelmets.com/lean-spark-plug-chart/
IMO the plugs are good.
But the distributor cap is saying there is a problem. The arc tracing on 3 of 6 plug terminals, 2 being not good at all indicate there is a problem. It could be the cap, but first guess since they are all one side is the distributor shaft or gear may be worn.
A coil/points/condenser will usually have indications on all plug terminals.
The other possibility is 3 bad wires and if those worst arc lines are cylinders 5 + 3 then I'd start there and replace the rotor/cap.

I’ll pick up a new cap and rotor today and try that first.  

Thoughts on something like this?

https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40021/10002/-1" rel="nofollow - https://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/40021/10002/-1


-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: Trader
Date Posted: Mar/24/2023 at 2:53pm
With that distributor your going to have to wire it for full 12vdc, need newer ignition wires and modern spark plugs.
With that output voltage jump it would be well advised to ask others that have that distributor what spark plugs they are running as the heat range will likely need to change for optimum performance/longevity.


Posted By: bigbad69
Date Posted: Mar/24/2023 at 3:14pm
Points, rotors, and caps are old technology. The ability to score good products has vastly reduced in the last couple of decades. Your problem may be as simple as a bad cap casting. Then again, it may not. Replacing the the cap and rotor may not help. Then again, it may. Do you see a theme developing? Smile

Electronic ignition should not improve the running characteristics of a street driven points/condenser ignition. However, if the product quality is better, then it just might. There are good good conversion distributors and bad ones. To be honest, I don't know the status of the one in your link.

If you do go electronic, don't forget about the resistance wire which drops voltage to the coil. Electronic systems may require full 12V.

You might investigate Trader's suggestion of worn distributor bushings before dropping coin on electronic ignition. If you do the fix yourself, it will be cheaper.

The first car I ever drove had a 199 in it. It may not have an overabundance of power, but it took abuse from three teenagers and lived to tell the tale. Good solid engine IMO.


-------------
69 Javelin SST BBO 390 T10


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Mar/24/2023 at 5:01pm
Plugs, wires, and a rotor cost me a grand total of $41 at AutoZone. I swapped all of that out with the new spark plugs correctly gapped and that seems to have resolved the issue. I was going to do one part at a time to kind of figure out what was the actual cause, but we have some rain on the forecast and I didn’t want to run out of time.

The HEI distributor does intrigue me, although I don’t know if there would really be any advantage to a vehicle like mine, other than reducing the amount of installed parts.


-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: FSJunkie
Date Posted: Mar/25/2023 at 2:38am
The carbon tracks on the two adjacent terminals but not on the other four terminals is concerning. Perhaps the cap was installed improperly at an angle. 

Pertronix modules are practically immune to worn distributor bushings, unlike points.

The ignition timing could be wrong as well. Over-advanced timing can cause an engine to stumble in a way that feels like a misfire. People often crank up the timing thinking more is better (not the case), so if you do not know what the timing is set at currently, I suggest checking it. 


-------------
1955 Packard
1966 Marlin
1972 Wagoneer
1973 Ambassador
1977 Hornet
1982 Concord D/L
1984 Eagle Limited


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Mar/25/2023 at 8:40am
Originally posted by FSJunkie FSJunkie wrote:

The carbon tracks on the two adjacent terminals but not on the other four terminals is concerning. Perhaps the cap was installed improperly at an angle. 

Pertronix modules are practically immune to worn distributor bushings, unlike points.

The ignition timing could be wrong as well. Over-advanced timing can cause an engine to stumble in a way that feels like a misfire. People often crank up the timing thinking more is better (not the case), so if you do not know what the timing is set at currently, I suggest checking it. 

I am running a perteonix currently, the miss at speed is gone but the idle is still “lumpy”.  Timing is at around 9 btdc hot with vac advance disconnected. I was running 6 BTDC before but a friend of mine that’s an old school mechanic said that wasn’t enough and might be the cause of my miss. 


-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: FSJunkie
Date Posted: Mar/25/2023 at 8:03pm
You need to check your manual for the correct timing specification and setting procedure. 10* BTDC at 500 RPM with the vacuum hose disconnected sounds about right. If it runs better with the hose disconnected, that tells you something. 

-------------
1955 Packard
1966 Marlin
1972 Wagoneer
1973 Ambassador
1977 Hornet
1982 Concord D/L
1984 Eagle Limited


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Mar/25/2023 at 8:29pm
Originally posted by FSJunkie FSJunkie wrote:

You need to check your manual for the correct timing specification and setting procedure. 10* BTDC at 500 RPM with the vacuum hose disconnected sounds about right. If it runs better with the hose disconnected, that tells you something. 

I don’t have the manual for this engine as it’s not the original, it’s out of a 69. I will adjust to 10 degrees and see how it does. 


-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: FSJunkie
Date Posted: Mar/26/2023 at 1:09am
Well, if it's an engine out of a 1969 then it's not a 195.6, but a 199 or a 232. Those are completely different engines.

Anything from 5* to 10* BTDC at 500 RPM with the vacuum hose disconnected will make a 199 or 232 idle happily. 

Setting the timing with the hose connected or with the engine idling faster than 600 RPM will cause you problems. 



-------------
1955 Packard
1966 Marlin
1972 Wagoneer
1973 Ambassador
1977 Hornet
1982 Concord D/L
1984 Eagle Limited


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Mar/26/2023 at 7:27am
Originally posted by FSJunkie FSJunkie wrote:

Well, if it's an engine out of a 1969 then it's not a 195.6, but a 199 or a 232. Those are completely different engines.

Anything from 5* to 10* BTDC at 500 RPM with the vacuum hose disconnected will make a 199 or 232 idle happily. 

Setting the timing with the hose connected or with the engine idling faster than 600 RPM will cause you problems. 


Correct, it is a 199 with about 450 miles since rebuild.  


-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Mar/26/2023 at 10:17am
I have fiddled with this thing all morning, but I just cannot get it to like a 500 RPM idle. 600 RPMs it seems to be completely OK with it. I’ve got it pretty smooth, but dropping down to 500 it’s lumpy and it’s makes noise like it’s trying to die.  

-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: Trader
Date Posted: Mar/26/2023 at 10:53am
232 idle factory specifications were 550 to 600 RPM depending on year, 5 typical but up to 10 degrees advance for some applications.
Fine tune it with a vacuum gauge if you really want to know what the engine likes.


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Mar/26/2023 at 11:24am
Originally posted by Trader Trader wrote:

232 idle factory specifications were 550 to 600 RPM depending on year, 5 typical but up to 10 degrees advance for some applications.
Fine tune it with a vacuum gauge if you really want to know what the engine likes.

That is a tool I actually don’t have, I guess I need to get one.


-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: FSJunkie
Date Posted: Mar/28/2023 at 2:46am
Set the timing at 600 RPM then. Should still work fine. 

-------------
1955 Packard
1966 Marlin
1972 Wagoneer
1973 Ambassador
1977 Hornet
1982 Concord D/L
1984 Eagle Limited


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Mar/28/2023 at 10:05am
Originally posted by FSJunkie FSJunkie wrote:

Set the timing at 600 RPM then. Should still work fine. 

So I got a vac gauge and following procedure I found online I still ended up at about 10 degrees, it’s running pretty well now. 


-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: Trader
Date Posted: Mar/28/2023 at 10:24am
That's just fine. 
Don't sweat over factory specifications like this that are decades old with much different fuel.
My neighbor's 1929 Hump Mobiles, straight 8's, he was trying to tune them to factory specification and they ran like crap at 0 degrees advance, 400 RPM idle. 
5 degrees, carburetor adjustment, 500 RPM idle, 91 octane fuel and they run like a charm now. Spark plugs on that thing are massive things and dual point distributors in 1929!


Posted By: 1948kaiser
Date Posted: Mar/28/2023 at 10:54am
are the flat springs that hold the cap on are they tight or loose?


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Apr/03/2023 at 9:15pm
Originally posted by 1948kaiser 1948kaiser wrote:

are the flat springs that hold the cap on are they tight or loose?

I'm not sure which springs you're referencing? 

Also, I'm still getting a little bumpy idle, its not bad but I feel like it should be smoother.  


-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: FSJunkie
Date Posted: Apr/04/2023 at 4:05am
Something is wrong with an AMC six if you can feel it idle at all, and usually they idle smoothly over a wide range of base timing settings. They are not usually very picky. 

I'm starting to think this engine might have a weak or dead cylinder. 

Have you done a power balance test on it yet? That is where you disconnect (or short) each spark plug wire one by one and note how much the engine slows down when you kill that cylinder. Any cylinder that causes less reaction than the others or no reaction at all is weak or dead.




-------------
1955 Packard
1966 Marlin
1972 Wagoneer
1973 Ambassador
1977 Hornet
1982 Concord D/L
1984 Eagle Limited


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Apr/04/2023 at 9:40am
Originally posted by FSJunkie FSJunkie wrote:

Something is wrong with an AMC six if you can feel it idle at all, and usually they idle smoothly over a wide range of base timing settings. They are not usually very picky. 

I'm starting to think this engine might have a weak or dead cylinder. 

Have you done a power balance test on it yet? That is where you disconnect (or short) each spark plug wire one by one and note how much the engine slows down when you kill that cylinder. Any cylinder that causes less reaction than the others or no reaction at all is weak or dead.



I am not familiar with that test, but I’ll give it a shot. Is there anyway to do that without getting zapped by the ignition coil?


-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: Heavy 488
Date Posted: Apr/04/2023 at 1:13pm
Pull the plugs wires from the cap side.


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Apr/04/2023 at 1:35pm
Originally posted by Heavy 488 Heavy 488 wrote:

Pull the plugs wires from the cap side.

That would make sense, I ended up using plastic fishing pliers to pull the boots one at a time and this is what I got. 

Base idle warm with 85 degree ambient was 525rpm, drops are as below.
Cyl 1-475 rpm
cyl 2-470 rpm
cyl 3-480 rpm
cyl 4-475 rpm
cyl 5-455 rpm
cyl 6-455 rpm

So since there is some variance, what could this mean for this engine? 



-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: Trader
Date Posted: Apr/04/2023 at 2:21pm
It means at less then 10% variance you don't have a bad cylinder.
If ignition is better now, then it's likely fuel causing your stumbling.
Don't know if this is the same tank of gas or what grade your running. Some stabilizer like Seafoam in the tank will help clean the system and you may consider a different fuel supplier or one grade higher octane.
You could wind in your idle screws counting the turns to gently bottom, pull them, clean and reinstall to the same setting.
525 RPM idle is still low IMO, especially since you like heavy oil, and it would definitely stumble at those numbers less then 500 RPM for this test.
Bump the idle up to at least 550 and drive the car with the can of Seafoam or equivalent in the tank. Fill it with some fresh fuel and then see how it runs.


Posted By: nickleone
Date Posted: Apr/04/2023 at 2:23pm
Last thought, have you adjusted the valves on this REBUILT engine?

Nick


-------------
nick
401 71 Gremlin pro rally car sold
390 V8 SX/4 pro rally car sold
1962 Classic SW T5 4 wheel disc brakes


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Apr/04/2023 at 6:59pm
Originally posted by nickleone nickleone wrote:

Last thought, have you adjusted the valves on this REBUILT engine?

Nick
I don’t believe there is any adjustment in the 199 valve train. 


-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Apr/04/2023 at 7:29pm
Originally posted by Trader Trader wrote:

It means at less then 10% variance you don't have a bad cylinder.
If ignition is better now, then it's likely fuel causing your stumbling.
Don't know if this is the same tank of gas or what grade your running. Some stabilizer like Seafoam in the tank will help clean the system and you may consider a different fuel supplier or one grade higher octane.
You could wind in your idle screws counting the turns to gently bottom, pull them, clean and reinstall to the same setting.
525 RPM idle is still low IMO, especially since you like heavy oil, and it would definitely stumble at those numbers less then 500 RPM for this test.
Bump the idle up to at least 550 and drive the car with the can of Seafoam or equivalent in the tank. Fill it with some fresh fuel and then see how it runs.

I’ve run only ethanol free fuel with startron and MMO, I took your advice and cleaned the idle screw/needle as it did have some buildup.  The car seems to be idling much better now.

Also I’m running 10/30 oil now and have idle about 600. 




-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.


Posted By: farna
Date Posted: Apr/11/2023 at 4:29pm
We keep forgetting you're running a 69 199 and not the original 196!! I was about to say something but read through the entire thread before typing and got the reminder!

Why don't you change your signature to "1963 Classic 550 w/1969 199"? you can leave "Rambler" in if you want, but on this board we would all know or assume that part. Or remember to note it's a 69 199 when you ask engine related questions. Otherwise we assume you're talking about the original engine...


-------------
Frank Swygert


Posted By: mtrosclair
Date Posted: Apr/11/2023 at 4:58pm
Originally posted by farna farna wrote:

We keep forgetting you're running a 69 199 and not the original 196!! I was about to say something but read through the entire thread before typing and got the reminder!

Why don't you change your signature to "1963 Classic 550 w/1969 199"? you can leave "Rambler" in if you want, but on this board we would all know or assume that part. Or remember to note it's a 69 199 when you ask engine related questions. Otherwise we assume you're talking about the original engine...

Good point, I will do that. 


-------------
1963 Rambler Classic 550
Originally a 196, this one has a 199 from a 69 American.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net